Brushing the dust off
We muse and go all wistful over images of yesteryear and we think they should be black and white, slightly fuzzy and preferably with a bit of creased sepia marks. Our conceptions of bygone eras are mostly dotted with stereotypes and "facts" that have been passed down. The 1940s' for instance wasn't all war propaganda posters with blonde hair and red lipstick or Southern belles in frothy gowns often depicted in black and white. As I was doing a lot of Flickr searching today, I came across these images that Elegance is Refusal had uploaded from vintage issues of Vogue. Note the dates because even I had to raise my eyebrows a little at the earliness of the years. The poses, the judgement of light and the scenarios/set-ups all look extremely contemporary and the fact that they are in colour instantly make you think of an era other than the 40s'. The dust is well and truly brushed off.
1966 - Yes, this one isn't of the 40s' but I just had to point this one to say that there was a reason I have never warmed to flares and it is because they have never been as extreme and exaggerated as these ones. I want giant flappy flared trews and I want them now.




































Wow, these are seriously stunning!!! I am in awe when I see the dates!
Posted by: dapper kid | 16 October 2008 at 17:44
I saw this post without reading it and wondered on what mag you found those pics...then I read it...... GOOOOOODDD!!!!
NEVER would I hve imagined it was from the 40s....INCREDIBLE
Posted by: SUPA KiD | 16 October 2008 at 19:00
Im actually stunned by the dates that those photos were taken. Its almost shocking how contemporary they look!
FBF
Posted by: flatbrokefab Ashleigh | 16 October 2008 at 19:58
I agree that they don't seem to be as 'old' as I had expected, but one thing I did notice would have to be that the models look like women and not girls.
Posted by: Jill | 16 October 2008 at 20:59
These are amazing and so 'surprisingly' modern. Vintage Vogue takes the cake in creativity in any era.
Posted by: Fajr | 16 October 2008 at 21:21
Wow! In many ways better than current Vogue.
Posted by: floraposte | 16 October 2008 at 21:28
Ah such great images, I'm not sure if the sources are French or American Vogue, in the UK they had to rely a lot on illustrations during the war. I love the sixties flares - they are really out there, perfect.
Posted by: Make Do & Mend | 16 October 2008 at 21:33
i can't believe how contemporary these look! they would fit perfectly in a current issue of vogue.. what a great discovery susie!
thanks for bringing it to our attention:)
Posted by: la petite fashionista | 16 October 2008 at 21:56
wow!! i would have thought these were all current with with a 40s sort of hair/makeup. wow!
Posted by: Prêt à Porter P | 16 October 2008 at 22:39
Wow, I am in awe of these photos, they are amazing! The composition, artistry, everything! A M A Z I N G, I repeat!
Posted by: Brigadeiro | 16 October 2008 at 23:20
I love the sleeping beauty shot, towards the middle.
Posted by: donnatron | 16 October 2008 at 23:26
Wowwowwow! I love these photos and will definitely be looking into that Flickr stream!
Posted by: KD | 17 October 2008 at 00:23
Those pants are really spectacular.
Posted by: enc | 17 October 2008 at 02:11
I know just what you're talking about. I once saw a picture of this woman swimming in a fish tank with a mermaid fin taken in the 30s, and she seemed so fresh and raw and exposed that I just couldn't imagine that she was busy living in the era of Greta Garbo and the Great Depression. These pictures have the same effect. They make that ancient pre-war era seem much more like real life.
Posted by: Cammila | 17 October 2008 at 03:21
!!! Stunning! Thank you for sharing those.
Posted by: Annie Spandex | 17 October 2008 at 05:17
I was really impressed with the lady wearing the red dress. It is really good to wear for parties and special occasions. And the shoes also look good too
Posted by: grayfiber | 17 October 2008 at 09:30
hi susie=) just letting you know your picture is on here: http://tokyobopper.com/?day=20081016
Posted by: aliceee! | 17 October 2008 at 09:49
Hoooooly! That's all I have to say...and that second to last, looks like Juliette Lewis has timetraveled!
Posted by: indie | 17 October 2008 at 11:26
Pretty and mad!
juliet xxx
Posted by: juliet | 17 October 2008 at 11:53
Pretty and mad!
juliet xxx
Posted by: juliet | 17 October 2008 at 11:53
This is the first time I visit this blog, and the first post I see have these WONDERFUL pictures.. Love it already!!:) And what a cute layout. Can't belive I haven't seen this blog before, it's going straght into my bloglist now.
Posted by: hek | 17 October 2008 at 12:20
I'm impressed and at the same time, I think if they could do so incredible designs, they had to show that the same way...
Posted by: mer | 17 October 2008 at 13:22
So ahead of their time! The hair and make-up kinda gives them away...but such bright colours and 'modern' poses/styling.
The slightly cross-eyed snow white (and seven 'dwarfs') is my favourite!
Posted by: Carl Starling | 17 October 2008 at 15:35
those ballet slipper/shoes, adorable. and the straw hat shot could have been from spring 08 Vogue.
Posted by: fashionherald | 17 October 2008 at 16:02
apart from the contemporary styling, it's the models that really stand out for me. like jill said, they look like actual women instead of emaciated young girls.
refreshing.
Posted by: tanya | 18 October 2008 at 04:15
Oh wow, these are so sophisticated. I want to see more!
Posted by: nuvonova | 18 October 2008 at 11:50
that picture with all the coloured ballet falts- could have well been the campaign for those juicy coloured prada flats a while back.
Posted by: a dreamer | 19 October 2008 at 05:16
Another startlingly modern-looking woman is the star and director of Meshes of the Afternoon, Maya Deren.
Granted, it was a short art-film, so it shouldn't be a complete surprise that she was pretty bohemian-looking for the time (1943).
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4002812108181388236
Posted by: Sarah | 20 October 2008 at 03:31
Wow, what a treasure trove.
Posted by: ambika | 20 October 2008 at 17:50
I just finished reading a book about underwear and I was intrigued by how "racy" some of the underwear editorials in old magazines were.
Posted by: Jael | 23 October 2008 at 19:53
Veeery impressive!
Wow. I'm dazzled...
Posted by: Ciça | 03 November 2008 at 17:18